Adding people you don't know will not improve security. In practice, you should probably use both of these options, unless you are really paranoid, in which case you should of course only connect to people you trust. Insecure mode should work automatically once enabled, so the rest of this page is about connecting to Friends. To connect to your friends' nodes, you have to exchange Node references with them.
The references must be added on both sides to be established. When you have a freshly connected node, you have no data cached in your datastore, and very few connections even if insecure mode is enabled. Requests are sent out in a random fashion. This makes some or all requests time out before retrieving anything. It takes a couple of days for your Freenet node to get up to speed, so please don't get discouraged by this.
You should have at least three nodes that are connected to you at all times, ideally at least five to seven. Since some nodes may be unreachable at times, you need to connect to some more nodes to get the expected number. The nodes that are connected directly to you are the only nodes on Freenet that might see what kind of traffic passes through to your Freenet node. But if insecure mode is enabled, any node can find yours; this is the big advantage of not enabling insecure mode: you are effectively invisible except to your friends.
In practice most people start off with insecure mode and gradually add friends, and hopefully turn off insecure mode once they have at least 10 friends. Node A in the figure also has a number of nodes connected to it, but they are all except from your own node invisible to you. The traffic routing algorithm is therefore only able to direct traffic to one of the few nodes that you know of that it thinks is most able to find what you are looking for.
The traffic is encrypted, so it is quite difficult for the nodes that you connect to to see what your Freenet traffic consists of, but it is far from impossible. It is therefore important that you connect only to people you know.
If that is not possible, then at least people you've talked to. Connecting peer nodes with FProxy can be done in several ways. Below is the thing that makes it all happen:. The paste-bin then returns an URL e. Make sure that you add? This makes the link point only to the actual pasted data, with no extra design elements. It might look something like this cut to fit on the screen :. Remember that both you and the node you are connecting to must add references to make the connection work.
When you have a number of connections, you can visit the Darknet page. It should look something like this:. In addition to its anonymity features, as a content distribution network Freenet has the following strengths:. This page contains links to freely available content on Freenet. If you would like to add a new link please get in touch! Freenet can be thought of as a large storage device. When you store a file in it, you receive a key which can be used to retrieve the file.
When you supply Freenet with a key, it returns the appropriate file if it is located. The storage space is distributed among all connected nodes on Freenet. Freenet is a peer-to-peer network which is both decentralized and anonymized. The nodes that you connect to only know their nearest neighbours and have no idea about how the network as a whole is structured.
Freenet is built on the principle of small world networks. By connecting to nodes of people you already know, and the people you know in turn connect to people they know, one should be able to reach all nodes in a Freenet network.
All Freenet nodes contribute a part of their hard drive space to store encrypted pieces of files. They are stored in the datastore directory in the Freenet installation directory. Unlike other peer-to-peer networks, you as a user have little or no control over what is stored in your datastore.
Instead, files are kept or deleted depending on how popular they are. This allows Freenet to be censorship-resistant. There is no "delete file" operation. It is hard, but not impossible, to determine what the encrypted file pieces stored in your local Freenet datastore are part of. This allows plausible deniability. Freenet suggests an initial size based on how much space is available, and you can change the store size at any time. A larger store uses more RAM, but makes for better browsing for you and helps Freenet as a whole.
Initially, each node has no information about the performance of the other nodes it knows about. This means that routing of requests is essentially random. But since different nodes have different randomness, they will disagree about where to send a request, given a key. So the data in a newly-started Freenet will be distributed somewhat randomly. As more documents are inserted by the same node, they will begin to cluster with data items whose keys see below are similar, because the same routing rules are used for all of them.
More importantly, as data items and requests from different nodes "cross paths", they will begin to share clustering information as well. The result is that the network will self-organize into a distributed, clustered structure where nodes tend to hold data items that are close together in key space. The installer currently has some problems. Download Freenet for OSX. Get the installer Java-based installer gpg signature ; keyring.
Java version 8 or higher is required. You should keep Java up to date to avoid problems and for better performance.
If there are problems we recommend the following command lines. They require wget which can be installed with a package manager, such as sudo apt-get install wget on Debian or Ubuntu. To install on a headless system, or if you get fontconfig problems, use the -console option and follow the prompts:. There is also a Java Web Start installer which used to be more convenient but might not work on your distribution.
We would like to make distribution packages for easier installation, and have an in-development and not maintained Debian package , but haven't gotten it stable or made official ones for other distributions. If you are a developer and would like to join us and help it would be much appreciated!
If you cannot access our official releases, you can try the http mirror or the tor mirror provided by Lysator. If you have a working Freenet installation directory that you have mirrored from one Unix machine to another e.
All you actually need to do is tell the system you've mirrored to that it should start the Freenet proxy daemon for you on boot. However: each installation has a unique identity key generated at installation time. If you try to run two instances with the same identity at the same time , both proxy demons will become confused and upset. Don't do this! Please try the step by step guide to setting up Freenet and various Freenet apps, especially if installing on OS X.
We are not responsible for unofficial third party apps it recommends including FMS , but many Freenet users and developers use them. Of course no issue is black and white, and there are many who feel that censorship is a good thing in some circumstances. For example, in some European countries propagating information deemed to be racist is illegal. Governments seek to prevent people from advocating ideas which are deemed damaging to society.
There are two answers to this however. The first is that you can't allow those in power to impose "good" censorship, without also enabling them to impose "bad" censorship. To impose any form of censorship a government must have the ability to monitor and thus restrict communication. There are already criticisms that the anti-racism censorship in many European countries is hampering legitimate historical analysis of events such as the second world war.
The second argument is that this "good" censorship is counter-productive even when it does not leak into other areas. For example, it is generally more effective when trying to persuade someone of something to present them with the arguments against it, and then answer those arguments.
Unfortunately, preventing people from being aware of the often sophisticated arguments used by racists, makes them vulnerable to those arguments when they do eventually encounter them. Of course the first argument is the stronger one, and would still hold-true even if you didn't accept the second. Basically, you either have censorship, or you don't.
There is no middle-ground. You cannot have freedom of speech without the option to remain anonymous. Most censorship is retrospective, it is generally much easier to curtail free speech by punishing those who exercise it afterward, rather than preventing them from doing it in the first place. The only way to prevent this is to remain anonymous. It is a common misconception that you cannot trust anonymous information.
This is not necessarily true, using digital signatures people can create a secure anonymous pseudonym which, in time, people can learn to trust. Freenet incorporates a mechanism called "subspaces" to facilitate this. Of course much of Freenet's publicity has centered around the issue of copyright, and thus I will speak to it briefly. The core problem with copyright is that enforcement of it requires monitoring of communications, and you cannot be guaranteed free speech if someone is monitoring everything you say.
This is important, most people fail to see or address this point when debating the issue of copyright, so let me make it clear:. It is for this reason that Freenet, a system designed to protect Freedom of Speech, must prevent enforcement of copyright.
Firstly, even if copyright were the only way that artists could be rewarded for their work, then I would contend that freedom is more important than having professional artists those who claim that we would have no art do not understand creativity: people will always create, it is a compulsion, the only question is whether they can do it for a living.
Secondly, it could be questioned whether copyright is effective even now. The music industry is one of the most vocally opposed to enhancements in communication technology, yet according to many of the artists who should be rewarded by copyright, it is failing to do so. Rather it has allowed middle-men to gain control over the mechanisms of distribution, to the detriment of both artists and the public. Fortunately it won't come to this.
There are many alternative ways to reward artists. The simplest is voluntary payment. This is an extension of the patronage system which was frequently used to reward artists prior to copyright, where a wealthy person would fund an artist to allow them to create full-time. The Internet permits an interesting extension of this idea, where rather than having just one wealthy patron, you could have hundreds of thousands, contributing small amounts of money over the Internet.
Ian started the Freenet Project around July of , and continues to coordinate the project. Learn more about Ian on his personal website. Matthew has been working on Freenet since before the 0. His work and that of others has resulted in dramatic improvements to the performance and stability of the network.
Oskar was also one of the earliest contributors to the Freenet Project, and has made some important theoretical breakthroughs that lead to the beginning of Freenet 0. Since , Florent has improved various aspects of the software and performed the project's system administration.
0コメント